|
|
Post by ruizhan on Mar 4, 2021 0:47:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ruizhan on Mar 4, 2021 20:03:34 GMT
A followup question is that are there any existing supports for TCG commands?
Ideally I'm thinking using a schema that supports TCG commands with lock/unlock feature.
|
|
|
|
Post by Richelle Ahlvers on Mar 5, 2021 17:31:09 GMT
To clarify, you are asking about lock/unlock related to TCG functionality, correct? I believe this is the context of your original question based on the follow-up comment, but want to confirm.
We do not have anything in the NVMe mapping doc to date (or in the new version v1.2.2, pending release in the next couple of weeks), that covers this functional area. Today the control of NVMe drives with TCG support is done using the NVMe commands either through the host interface or through the NVMe-MI interface; we would need to develop the standard mapping for this capability to RF/SF as future work.
Thanks,
Richelle
|
|
|
|
Post by ruizhan on Mar 8, 2021 4:17:07 GMT
Thanks for confirming that, Richelle!
Yes, we are looking for existing mappings for TCG lock/unlock, and we are considering whether we should add that standard mapping.
|
|
|
|
Post by ruizhan on Mar 23, 2021 17:35:21 GMT
Hi Richelle, we are planning to propose the standard TCG mapping to RF/SF, is it okay if we only propose the mapping for the TCG commands we need (3 or 4 commands)?
Thanks,
Rui
|
|
