|
Post by wesleyhunt on May 8, 2017 20:59:05 GMT
What is the *correct* thing to do when extending the schema.
Is it #1. Adding everything to the existing OEM field? #2. Deriving a new resource type that inherits from an existing resource?
The spec talks primarily about option #1, but for instance (https://hewlettpackard.github.io/ilo4-rest-api-docs/#hpserverpcislot) shows HP specific derived resource types for many resources. If option #2 is more right than #1 why have the OEM field at all?
I would very much appreciate any light on the subject.
|
|